My three lessons concentrate on information processing,
gaining facts from multiple resources to answer predetermined questions, that
attempt to widen their gaze and the complexity of the world. Allowing students
to discover truths about things, that mean something to them, helps them to
relate to the topic. If the student has a relationship with the knowledge it is
more likely to be effective and promote further learning.
Group work is also integrated into the lessons, opening up
channels for communication between the students, which allows for regulated
social interaction. Also for the creation and definition of leaders and
followers in the group. Questions can be asked freely in this environment.
They need to realise where scientific knowledge has
come/evolved from and how it contributes to what we have today. That was the
reasoning behind the first lesson.
Initially, I wanted to integrate more inter student
teaching/instruction, but I ran out of lesson time. With the questionnaire on
the topic of their choice, I was going to suggest another, but have them do it
on something their “friend” is interested in, but know nothing about.
The syllabus document I have based my lessons around is the
NSW board of studies 7-10 syllabus, stage 4 science.
The NSW model of pedagogy
The three dimensions of the NSW
model from Board of Studies.
1 . Intellectual quality refers to pedagogy focused on
producing deep understanding of important, substantive concepts, skills and
ideas. Such pedagogy treats knowledge as something that requires active
construction and requires students to engage in higher-order thinking and to communicate
substantively about what they are learning.
2 . Quality learning environment
refers to pedagogy that creates classrooms where students and teachers work productively
in an environment clearly focused on learning. Such pedagogy sets high and
explicit expectations and develops positive relationships between teachers and students
and among students.
3 . Significance refers to pedagogy
that helps make learning meaningful and important to students. Such pedagogy draws
clear connections with students’ prior knowledge and identities, with contexts
outside of the classroom, and with multiple ways of knowing or cultural
perspectives.
No comments:
Post a Comment